Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100 200 |
1781. [Proposal] Allow smuggling - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Smiling Menace wrote: Not often I do this but...'Game mechanic working as intended'. Think you should change your Thread title to 'Dodging Tax on PI in Low Sec'. or ''Let me avoid interacting with others in this MMO'.
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2012.03.13 07:09:00
|
1782. The High-sec vote is not split too much; most of High-sec just doesn't vote ... - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
yes, the CSM certainly needs more balance between those who want more Eve and those who want more Second Life
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2012.03.11 23:28:00
|
1783. The High-sec vote is not split too much; most of High-sec just doesn't vote ... - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote: After thinking long and seriously about it, I thnk i got a plan so that Mittens is not elected never again. Step 1: discover Mittens' secret passion, still unknown even to him Step 2: allow Mittens meet & develop...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2012.03.11 22:27:00
|
1784. Industrialists? Should you vote? Who should you vote for? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Carl Thunderthise wrote: I'd vote for Issler: CSM experience, a balanced agenda, and no apparent fingers in the nullsec pie, leaving the nullsec obsessed members of the CSM to sort out their stuff without interference, bringing a better balance...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2012.03.11 22:18:00
|
1785. Unrepresented masses unite! Hear the bears roar! - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: Yes I am aware that you have allies and they are not from SA but goons are different due to the fact they are really not part of the EVE culture. I stated that I was concerned about Goons on the CSM as they are not part of th...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2012.03.11 15:04:00
|
1786. No support from me to CSM7 - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Dear OP, thanks for helping ensure the supremacy of the better organised voting blocs by encouraging unaffiliated and undereducated randoms not to vote!
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2012.03.11 11:46:00
|
1787. CCP, CSM and Bots - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: What I was wondering and tell me to put my till foil hat back on if need be, but would it be hard to implement a system that disconnects us miners for inactivity. As a back up system while they search for botters or if they ...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2012.03.11 10:15:00
|
1788. Industrialists? Should you vote? Who should you vote for? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Rykuss wrote: So, having said all that, Seleene and The Mittani don't need my votes as they are shoe-ins. My votes went to Hans because, in my opinion, he is the most logical choice and his platform speaks for itself. Whilst Hans seems a de...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2012.03.11 09:49:00
|
1789. CCP - Whats the point of having PODs anymore? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Perhaps you guys should learn to not suck at Eve?
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2012.03.10 17:32:00
|
1790. Legitimacy Vote Harvesting 'Darius III'? - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Tallian Saotome wrote: Edit: to be clear, D3s whole platform is that scamming and griefing are good, and should remain an core part of eve, and so he runs his campaign as a giant scam. I though D3's whole platform, was 'do nothing, contribut...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2012.03.10 17:29:00
|
1791. Industrialists? Should you vote? Who should you vote for? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Vladimir Vladimirovitch Putain wrote: I was at one point inclined to vote for Riverini only because of his anti botting stance. You mean the 'anti-botting stance' that had him publishing guides on his website about how to bot until CCP conta...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2012.03.10 12:36:00
|
1792. CCP! A lot of us want WiS - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jade Knight07 wrote: Then it was the implementation, forcing everyone to use WiS after you'd promised us that wouldn't happen. The 'turn off station environments' option was a slap in the face to us all. If you didn't want the Captain's Qua...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2012.03.10 12:26:00
|
1793. CCP! A lot of us want WiS - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Guard wrote: The plan is to take things slower than originally planned but also to eventually figure out a way for characters to interact in a meaningful way . Guard, why was this not figured out 6 years ago when walking in stations...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2012.03.10 11:57:00
|
1794. Sticky:New dev blog: Rebalancing EVE, one ship at a time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Assuming this goes through, will it be the first time that prerequisite skilles for existing hulls or items have been retrospectively added? I thought that to date the only skill requirement changes had been reducing levels of training needed fo...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2012.03.09 07:11:00
|
1795. Simple ways to fix the economy? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Much as I appreciate the 'kill nullsec' whine thread, you guys realise that most of those botters moved to highsec L4s after the anomaly nerf if they weren't there already, right?
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2012.03.08 22:58:00
|
1796. CCP! A lot of us want WiS - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP karkur wrote: wow... just wow. I hope you guys are joking. I'm sorry we are delivering something as well as working on wis... or no, actually I'm not sorry, I'm just sorry that some of you see it this way WiS advocates are..... strange.
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2012.03.06 23:01:00
|
1797. CCP! A lot of us want WiS - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So Issler, what features that CCP is currently working on should be abandoned in favour of more work on WiS?
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2012.03.06 21:31:00
|
1798. Sticky:New dev blog: Rebalancing EVE, one ship at a time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I'll be honest, I can see the rationale for battlecruisers, but splitting the destroyer skill into 4 when there's only 1 T1 destroyer for each race right now seems unnecessary. (unless this is a hint that more destroyers are coming???)
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2012.03.06 21:23:00
|
1799. KORVIN FOR CSM7 - the reasonable choice. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Snowflake Tem wrote: Scatim Helicon wrote: Snowflake Tem wrote: also believe that CSM6, 7 & 8 will not in any way influence CCP to improve the situation because The Mittani's priorities are different. Even if a RP candidate got in ...
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2012.03.06 20:14:00
|
1800. Sticky:New dev blog: Rebalancing EVE, one ship at a time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Isn't it our job to define roles for particular ships, not yours?
- by Scatim Helicon - at 2012.03.06 19:04:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100 200 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |